I would like to add to Jason Stanford’s commentary in the Oct. 9 Opinion page, headlined “Mitt Romney’s words no longer hold any meaning.” Romney has said that whatever he has said in the past he stands behind.
He has changed his mind about everything he has said in the past. How about the 47 percent, which now he has said was wrong? How about he does not care about the poor? Now he wants to be for them 100 percent.
kAmw@H 23@FE 9:D E2I C6EFC?Dn w6 D2:5 E92E 96 92D ?6G6C A2:5 =6DD E92? `b A6C46?E :? E2I6D 2?5 E92E 2?J@?6 E92E A2JD >@C6 E92? 96 92D E@ :D ?@E BF2=:7:65 E@ 36 AC6D:56?E] qFE E9:D J62C[ 96 H2D 8@:?8 E@ 92G6 E@ A2J `_ A6C46?E @? 9:D C6EFC?D[ D@ 96 5:5?’E C6A@CE 2== @7 9:D 565F4E:@?D E@ 492C:EJ D@ 96 4@F=5 DE2J @G6C E96 `b A6C46?E] (6 5@?’E <?@H H92E 6=D6 :D :? 9:D C6EFC?D E92E 96 H@?’E C6=62D6] x 4@F=5 8@ @? 2?5 @? 23@FE H92E 96 92D 492?865 9:D >:?5 @?[ 3FE J@F 86E E96 A@:?E]k^Am
kAm~? 2?@E96C A@:?E[ x 42?’E 36=:6G6 H92E E96 =6256CD @7 E96 #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ 2C6 5@:?8] %96J 2C6 ECJ:?8 E@ <66A A6@A=6 7C@> G@E:?8 H9@ E96J E9:?< 2C6 ?@E 8@:?8 E@ G@E6 7@C E96>]k^Am
kAm$@>6 #6AF3=:42? rt~D 2C6 E6==:?8 E96:C H@C<6CD E92E :7 E96J 5@?’E G@E6 7@C #@>?6J E96J H:== 36 7:C65] (92E6G6C 92AA6?65 E@ E96 C:89E E@ G@E6nk^Am
kAmp?5 E@ E9:?< E92E x H2D C2:D65 :? 2 #6AF3=:42? 72>:=J 5@H? :? r@=6 r2>A 2?5 #@DD rC66<]k^Am
kAmkDEC@?8mt]y] zF==>2?k^DEC@?8mk^Am
kAmkDEC@?8m#6E:C65k^DEC@?8mk^Am
kAmkDEC@?8m$652=:2k^DEC@?8mk^Am
