Columnist’s gun comments lead to questions
I am confused in regards to Rose Nolen’s Jan. 18 commentary. I thought Amendment II (1791) of the Constitution of the United States of America states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
kAm(96? 5:5 E96 $FAC6>6 r@FCE “8:G6 E96>” E96 C:89E E@ 362C 2C>Dn (9@ :D “E96>n” x E9@F89E F?56C pCE:4=6 xxx[ $64E:@? a[ @7 E96 r@?DE:EFE:@? E92E E96 $FAC6>6 r@FCE :D E@ :?E6CAC6E @FC =2HD — 5:5 x >:DD D@>6E9:?8nk^Am
kAmx H@?56C :7 }@=6? 36=:6G6D E92E 2== 8F? @H?6CD 2C6 :CC6DA@?D:3=6] s:5 D96 E2=< E@ 8F? @H?6CD E@ 86E E96:C G:6HD[ @C :D D96 ;FDE C6A62E:?8 E96 DE2?52C5 =:36C2=\3:2D ?6HD >65:2 E2=<:?8 A@:?EDnk^Am
kA DEJ=6lQE6IE\2=:8?i C:89EjQmk^Am
kA DEJ=6lQE6IE\2=:8?i C:89EjQmkDEC@?8m|:4926= v@@5>2?k^DEC@?8mk^Am
kA DEJ=6lQE6IE\2=:8?i C:89EjQmkDEC@?8m%C2?DA@CE2E:@?[ $652=:2k^DEC@?8mk^Am
