Quantcast


Last updated: September 06. 2013 12:56AM - 65 Views

Story Tools:

Font Size:

Social Media:

Columnist’s gun comments lead to questions


I am confused in regards to Rose Nolen’s Jan. 18 commentary. I thought Amendment II (1791) of the Constitution of the United States of America states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”


When did the Supreme Court “give them” the right to bear arms? Who is “them?” I thought under Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution that the Supreme Court is to interpret our laws — did I miss something?


I wonder if Nolen believes that all gun owners are irresponsible. Did she talk to gun owners to get their views, or is she just repeating the standard liberal-bias news media talking points?



Michael Goodman


Transportation, Sedalia



Comments
comments powered by Disqus



Featured Businesses


Poll



Info Minute



Gas Prices

Sedalia Gas Prices provided by GasBuddy.com